Does Flickr Automatically Creates Resized Images When Uploaded to the Page

Thread ini ditutup secara otomatis karena kekurangan respons lebih dari sebulan lalu.

Diskusi Saat Ini

Characteristic Request : metadata in shared / downloaded photos Terbaru: 9 jam yang lalu

Replace non working, over again. Terbaru: 12 jam yang lalu

[Acknowledged by Flickr Staff] Notifications Terbaru: 13 jam yang lalu

Is Flickr really still a community? Terbaru: 17 jam yang lalu

Sales content? Terbaru: 17 jam yang lalu

east-mail notifications stopped coming Terbaru: 19 jam yang lalu

I stopped getting email activeness alerts Terbaru: 21 jam yang lalu

Some contacts can't run into my recent post Terbaru: 22 jam yang lalu

Changes Terbaru: 27 jam yang lalu

[Acknowledged by Flickr Staff] Incomplete Member List Terbaru: 28 jam yang lalu

'All Activity' images non showing Terbaru: 29 jam yang lalu

Subsequently xx photo'due south in that location are no more than photo's on my feed Terbaru: 32 jam yang lalu

Lainnya...

Cari di Forum Bantuan

Is at that place a way to automobile resize hi-res scanned images in flickr so that snapfish...

bilang: Is at that place a fashion to auto resize hi-res scanned images in flickr so that snapfish volition have them for printing... I uploaded a Agglomeration of scanned images from my family photograph album dating back from the 30's to lx'south that are blackness/white. When I sent them over to snapfish from inside flicker, it rejected about xxx% because of size limitations. Whatsoever suggestions on how to send over with out going in by mitt and sending smaller ones? If not, I think that would exist a very very neat characteristic. Di-posting pada 19:03, 26 January 2010 ( permalink )

	Wil C. Fry bilang: 1) There is no way to "auto-resize" photos on Flickr 2) Flickr photos tin can be edited on Picnik (just click "edit" on the photo page), but they have to be done one at a time. 3) If SnapFish can't accept Flickr photos (of whatever size), that sounds like a bug, since that company is Flickr'southward default printing service... Di-posting pada sudah lama. ( permalink )
	The Searcher bilang: More often than not with printing, the larger the size the better. If in that location's a file size consequence, well I would think Snapfish would take the same size limit as Flickr (20 megs). If they don't that definitely sounds similar a issues. [edit: according to Snapfish's assistance section, they accept files from Flickr up to 25megs, which exceeds Flickr's own filesize limit.] Di-posting pada sudah lama. ( permalink ) The Searcher mengedit topik ini sudah lama.
	V@n bilang: Directly quote from the Snapfish/Flickr FAQ: Please notation that photo files you import must be smaller than 25 megapixels or smaller.. If y'all have photos larger than 25 megapixels, apply the edit photo tool on Flickr to reduce the size before you import to Snapfish. One would retrieve Snapfish would know that megapixels is not a mensurate of file size, not to mention that the linguistic communication would benefit from the attentions of an editor. *sigh* On behalf of the OP here, I voted "Not Helpful" on the Snapfish FAQ feedback push button. Di-posting pada sudah lama. ( permalink )
	The Searcher bilang: I causeless that was a typo, and they meant "megabytes". But maybe not. They say elsewhere that their "upload server" has a 100meg limit, merely otherwise I tin't detect a mention of a file size limit anywhere. Di-posting pada sudah lama. ( permalink )
	Brenda Anderson bilang: Then, Flickr'southward limit is 20 megabytes... Snapfish limit is 25 megapixels. Seems that they should have coordinated this in advance? Di-posting pada sudah lama. ( permalink )
	Stevekin bilang: It's the document size and not the file size they are limiting. Their limit suggests that a photo (pixel dimensions) should not be more, for example, v,000 ten 5,000 pixels (= 25,000,000 (25MP)). It would seem that not so long ago the limit was 9 Megapixels and anything to a higher place was downsized. I guess the limit has been upped, merely they don't desire to downsize whatsoever more : getsatisfaction.com/snapfish/topics/downloading_snapfish_... File size would still exist.......limited to/accepted up to.......20 Megabytes I would take thought, as that'south the maximum we tin can upload to our accounts. Di-posting pada sudah lama. ( permalink )
	The Ewan bilang: Both limits make sense, they're just for different things. If all you're doing with a file is storing it and moving it around (as Flickr mostly does), then all yous intendance about is the file size of the compressed data. If you're going to process the epitome in whatsoever way, and then you pretty much need to uncompress it, at which point the amount of data you've got to handle is entirely dependent on the image size (in pixels), not the file size of the original compressed representation (in bytes). Without a pixel size limit it would be possible to send Snapfish a very modest JPEG file that was extremely efficiently compressed (for instance, a large slab of uniform solid colour) that would expand to a very large amount of data when uncompressed, and that might well be a trouble. Other things that process images have pixel size limits too - Flickr has one that affects the generation of the smaller sizes from the original that sometimes bites people with huge stitched panoramas (though IIRC it's based on longest dimension, not total number of pixels), and Piknik suffers from Flash's limit of 4000x4000 (for Flash 10; information technology's lower in before Flash versions). Di-posting pada sudah lama. ( permalink )

Thread ini ditutup secara otomatis karena kekurangan respons lebih dari sebulan lalu.

bermudezthairstur.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.flickr.com/help/forum/en-us/119579/

Share this post